What do you think about lolicon manga? - manga lolicon x
"Christopher Handley, 39, Glenwood, Iowa, pleaded guilty today in Des Moines, Iowa, possession of obscene visual representations of sexual violence and the transmission of obscene materials.
Material according to court records, in May 2006, have U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a parcel of mail intercepted his arrival in America, Japan, aimed at Handley. In the package are obscene, including books containing visual depictions of sexual abuse of children, particularly Japanese manga drawings of women, young men sexually abused adults and animals. under a search warrant, searched the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS), and took other obscene drawings of sexual abuse of children in the household of Handley in Glenwood. Handley was a grand jury sitting in the Southern District of Iowa prosecuted May 2007. "
============================
Is not that another way the government is the dismantling of our freedoms, one bit at a time? Or should we start thKids Ink pixelated, so it is very likely that the potential for the conservation of collectors of child pornography outside the 'real?
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Manga Lolicon X What Do You Think About Lolicon Manga?
9 comments:
The pictures do not hurt anybody, it is better to have fun, something wrong, that something real. Banning something is a remarkable slipperly, first go to the cartoons, it will be next will be something more drastic. I do not like what others do in their own homes as long as it does not hurt.
Dismantling of our freedoms government? Absolutely - one step at a time.
First Amendment, it would be nice. I think farts masturbatory material, the most likely to break and hurt a real person.
Books that do not cause violent death and sex books are not the cause of sex.
It is clear that children should have access to them, but that does not mean that the First Amendment should be abolished.
First Amendment, it would be nice. I think farts masturbatory material, the most likely to break and hurt a real person.
Books that do not cause violent death and sex books are not the cause of sex.
It is clear that children should have access to them, but that does not mean that the First Amendment should be abolished.
WTF?
He was arrested for the cartoon porn?
This is retarded.
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE REAL PORN FOR CHILDREN
Why not CHILDREN OF DRAWINGS porn?
o0oo0o0oo0o
Bullshit, I say.
XD
Well, I prefer "hentai in their 20s.
XD
"He said, yaoi
= W =
YES.
Yesss.
oo
WTF?
He was arrested for the cartoon porn?
This is retarded.
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE REAL PORN FOR CHILDREN
Why not CHILDREN OF DRAWINGS porn?
o0oo0o0oo0o
Bullshit, I say.
XD
Well, I prefer "hentai in their 20s.
XD
"He said, yaoi
= W =
YES.
Yesss.
oo
Their art fair, which hurt. In any case, the maintenance of the collectors of child pornography from the real thing. Personally, I do not like child pornography .. but we can not prevent people to see look at what is on! I prefer art that is the real thing.
Handley Should Have Known Better. Only the Democrats who have donated at least $ 500 to Democratic candidates, AIPAC and / or the ACLU and living in California or New England has allowed the practice of pedophiles.
Although they generally Iolicon disgusts me is just a drawing. This does not mean you will attack a small child. This could mean that the person has an unhealthy fetish most.
Better than the cartoons PC or the real deal.
Nasty, slippery slope here. What's next? And since when can e-mail, which just opened?
Post a Comment